Evaluating Peer Contributions to Group Work
نویسنده
چکیده
Collaborative group project work in the classroom is common in many disciplines, because it teaches, encourages, and reinforces numerous skills and competencies that are desirable in the job market. However, group work brings with it a number of implementation challenges, one of the most important of which is varying contribution levels among group members. Peer evaluations, or assessments, allow teachers to understand and evaluate information about the individual efforts of team members that would otherwise be unavailable. There is a tremendous amount of literature on the topic of peer evaluation. This review surveys a sampling of the relevant literature with respect to peer evaluation development, administration, and challenges, as well as some alternative techniques and considerations.
منابع مشابه
Group Collaboration, Scaffolding Instruction, and Peer Assessment of Iranian EFL Learners Oral Tasks
Peer assessment has gained growing popularity in education and teaching. Being a learning tool, evaluating their peers can equip learners with skills to develop judgments about what forms high-quality work. There have been however research gaps in the literature showing a lack of adequate work on the investigation of peer assessment in a group-oriented classroom context. The present study inten...
متن کاملUsing peer review to distribute group work marks equitably between medical students
BACKGROUND Although peer assessment has been used for evaluating performance of medical students and practicing doctors, it has not been studied as a method to distribute a common group work mark equitably to medical students working in large groups where tutors cannot observe all students constantly. METHODS The authors developed and evaluated a mathematical formulation whereby a common grou...
متن کاملSPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects
Students often enjoy learning in teams and developing teamwork skills, but criticise team assessment as unfair if there is equal reward for unequal contributions. This paper describes the design, implementation and evaluation in four subjects of the Self and Peer Assessment Resource Kit (SPARK), a web-based template which aims to improve learning from team assessment tasks and make the assessme...
متن کاملStudents’ Perceptions of Peer Evaluation in Project Work
To capitalise on the benefits of group work and at the same time alleviate the potential negative effect of benefiting from collective effort without contributing equally (also referred to as free-riding) and internal conflict, this project was conducted for the following purposes: design an approach to peer assessment of individual contributions to group work, evaluate student perceptions on t...
متن کاملThe Effect of Guided Reciprocal Peer Questioning (GRPQ) on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking and Metacognition Skills
Introduction: Fostering critical thinking and Metacognition is one of the most important objectives in nursing education. This study was designed to investigate the effect of guided reciprocal peer questioning on nursing students' critical thinking and Metacognition skills. Methods: In this quasi experimental study, the experiment group included 30 nursing students in their 6th semester in Bi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015